Economics in One Library
I’ve read one of these already; the rest are on my reading list.
I’ve read one of these already; the rest are on my reading list.
- Obama is not your savior. He is not a good president. He has created more debt than any other president before him. He’s gone back on every campaign promise. He’s only pandering to special needs to stay in power and get paid.
- Romney is the same damn person as Obama. Same fucking beliefs. Whether they say it or not. They’re the same fucking person.
- Republicans and Democrats are the same damn thing.
- The FDA is not actually doing their job. Ever. You’re an idiot if you think they do. They’re just another useless government agency.
- Cops are not good people. Regardless of what you think.
- PUBLIC SCHOOL IS NOT A GOOD THING. It’s only to breed more workers to work under the rich people. You morons.
- Anarchy=/=Braking things, punk music, destroying private property, “Fuck the Government!”, or any of the other pseudo-political, pseudo-activistic bullshit you mallgoths think it is.
- Marriage should not be controlled by the government. If you want to marry someone, if you want to be with that person for the rest of your life, if you truly love them, why the fuck haven’t you just moved in together, told everyone they’re you’re whatever noun you want to use, and just fucking lived your life happily? Oh, what’s that? Because you can’t file jointly, other wise? Because you need a piece of paper to validate your relationship to the IRS? Glad you mentioned that:
- THE IRS. IS JUST A BUNCH. OF THUGS. They can NOT legally tax you for anything other than alcohol, tobacco, and firearms, to my knowledge. It is NOT legal for them to tax your earnings. “But how will we have parks and roads?!” You idiot, that’s what the private sector is for. It would boost our economy MORE if it was citizens being hired to do the jobs and not the government contractors. Who, yes, are citizens, but they are paid by the government, to do a government job, which is funded by the taxation of YOUR hard earned wages.
- And, again, a president is not valid just because you think he’s got swag, or he has a nice smile, or is a good orator. Track record is more important.
- Also, if someone is the same religion as you, that’s not a valid reason to vote for them. I’d rather have an atheist president that’s intelligent and uses logic while respecting all religions and not letting his personal views cloud his judgement, than I would a Christian president that doesn’t understand the basics of human rights.
- And you idiots, it doesn’t matter what your sexual orientation is. Gay, Lesbian, Trans, Straight, wtf EVER. You don’t need seperate rights. So stop being fucking idiots and start VOTING for RIGHTS that benefit EVERYONE, NOT just special interest groups.
(Source: leatheriskawaii, via thedailyliberty)
(via eyesbiglove-crumbs)
Dearest Cadillac,
It has come to my attention that you have built this stunning concept car, the Cadillac Ciel. Permit me to express my most intimate and thoughtful feelings on the matter, and I do say this with the utmost sincerity:
DO WANT.
Yours most sincerely,
-Mike
(Source: cadillac.com)
My previous post on the nature of an INFP is accurate, yet it was skewed towards the negative aspects of the personality type. This definition is more broad and it incorporates some of the positive aspects. My life isn’t all doom and gloom.
As an INFP, your primary mode of living is focused internally, where you deal with things according to how you feel about them, or how they fit into your personal value system. Your secondary mode is external, where you take things in primarily via your intuition.
INFPs, more than other iNtuitive Feeling types, are focused on making the world a better place for people. Their primary goal is to find out their meaning in life. What is their purpose? How can they best serve humanity in their lives? They are idealists and perfectionists, who drive themselves hard in their quest for achieving the goals they have identified for themselves
INFPs are highly intuitive about people. They rely heavily on their intuitions to guide them, and use their discoveries to constantly search for value in life. They are on a continuous mission to find the truth and meaning underlying things. Every encounter and every piece of knowledge gained gets sifted through the INFP’s value system, and is evaluated to see if it has any potential to help the INFP define or refine their own path in life. The goal at the end of the path is always the same - the INFP is driven to help people and make the world a better place.
Generally thoughtful and considerate, INFPs are good listeners and put people at ease. Although they may be reserved in expressing emotion, they have a very deep well of caring and are genuinely interested in understanding people. This sincerity is sensed by others, making the INFP a valued friend and confidante. An INFP can be quite warm with people he or she knows well.
INFPs do not like conflict, and go to great lengths to avoid it. If they must face it, they will always approach it from the perspective of their feelings. In conflict situations, INFPs place little importance on who is right and who is wrong. They focus on the way that the conflict makes them feel, and indeed don’t really care whether or not they’re right. They don’t want to feel badly. This trait sometimes makes them appear irrational and illogical in conflict situations. On the other hand, INFPs make very good mediators, and are typically good at solving other people’s conflicts, because they intuitively understand people’s perspectives and feelings, and genuinely want to help them.
INFPs are flexible and laid-back, until one of their values is violated. In the face of their value system being threatened, INFPs can become aggressive defenders, fighting passionately for their cause. When an INFP has adopted a project or job which they’re interested in, it usually becomes a “cause” for them. Although they are not detail-oriented individuals, they will cover every possible detail with determination and vigor when working for their “cause”.
When it comes to the mundane details of life maintenance, INFPs are typically completely unaware of such things. They might go for long periods without noticing a stain on the carpet, but carefully and meticulously brush a speck of dust off of their project booklet.
INFPs do not like to deal with hard facts and logic. Their focus on their feelings and the Human Condition makes it difficult for them to deal with impersonal judgment. They don’t understand or believe in the validity of impersonal judgment, which makes them naturally rather ineffective at using it. Most INFPs will avoid impersonal analysis, although some have developed this ability and are able to be quite logical. Under stress, it’s not uncommon for INFPs to mis-use hard logic in the heat of anger, throwing out fact after (often inaccurate) fact in an emotional outburst.
INFPs have very high standards and are perfectionists. Consequently, they are usually hard on themselves, and don’t give themselves enough credit. INFPs may have problems working on a project in a group, because their standards are likely to be higher than other members’ of the group. In group situations, they may have a “control” problem. The INFP needs to work on balancing their high ideals with the requirements of every day living. Without resolving this conflict, they will never be happy with themselves, and they may become confused and paralyzed about what to do with their lives.
INFPs are usually talented writers. They may be awkard and uncomfortable with expressing themselves verbally, but have a wonderful ability to define and express what they’re feeling on paper. INFPs also appear frequently in social service professions, such as counselling or teaching. They are at their best in situations where they’re working towards the public good, and in which they don’t need to use hard logic.
INFPs who function in their well-developed sides can accomplish great and wonderful things, which they will rarely give themselves credit for. Some of the great, humanistic catalysts in the world have been INFPs.
(Source: personalitypage.com)
I do support people marrying whoever they want. I never said I didn’t. I don’t support the government decreeing which race or which gender shall and who shall not be allowed to make decisions for themselves. I also find the idea that one must receive a “license” to marry completely ludicrous. Marriage has absolutely nothing to do with the pretended aims of government and it should not be involved.
It isn’t because I don’t think marriage should exist, or even that I think it’s a state institution. Marriage is a commitment between two people to love and support one another for life. It is recognized by religion, communities, families, and society in general. The state is entirely superfluous to the equation. I am all for marriage. I can’t wait to get married some day down the line. However, to require couples to submit their relationship and family to the approval of the state - an entity which has no stake but its own power in the entire arrangement - is absolute garbage. And then on top of that to deny some people that happiness, based on entirely arbitrary characteristics of their DNA, is out of the question. Voluntary human interaction and commitment to another person is a basic human right. The government cannot grant nor remove that.
The life of an introvert.
(Source: amandaonwriting)
A few of my thoughts:
1) The majority in North Carolina probably haven’t been this happy since the Dredd Scott verdict.
2) Fox news must be utterly giddy with glee.
3) The government has no right to mandate what goes on in our bedrooms. A constitutional amendment is no place to define marriage rights.
4) Why must we obtain a marriage license in the first place? Marriage is older than the state, yet for some reason we must beg the government for approval. This is yet another way our government insists on controlling us.
When one tugs at a single thing in nature, he finds it attached to the rest of the world.
When I took the Meyers-Briggs personality assessment, I got this result:
INFP
creative, smart, idealist, loner, attracted to sad things, disorganized, avoidant, can be overwhelmed by unpleasant feelings, prone to quitting, prone to feelings of loneliness, ambivalent of the rules, solitary, daydreams about people to maintain a sense of closeness, focus on fantasies, acts without planning, low self confidence, emotionally moody, can feel defective, prone to lateness, likes esoteric things, wounded at the core, feels shame, frequently losing things, prone to sadness, prone to dreaming about a rescuer, disorderly, observer, easily distracted, does not like crowds, can act without thinking, private, can feel uncomfortable around others, familiar with the darkside, hermit, more likely to support marijuana legalization, can sabotage self, likes the rain, sometimes can’t control fearful thoughts, prone to crying, prone to regret, attracted to the counter culture, can be submissive, prone to feeling discouraged, frequently second guesses self, not punctual, not always prepared, can feel victimized, prone to confusion, prone to irresponsibility, can be pessimistic
All of this is true for me. But I mask a lot of it quite well. We live in a society where such things must be masked and hidden.
I’m not saying you should completely disregard your future. Just be mindful of the present once in a while.
Personally, I love Pearls Before Swine. It’s insight and self-referencing humor is great.
Here’s a link to the cartoonist’s blog.
http://stephanpastis.wordpress.com/
Big Maconomics: How McDonald’s Explains the World
The Big Mac is a triumph of technology.
For thousands of years, families devoted the majority of their lives to food. Their waking hours were spent growing and harvesting crops, and most of their income from growing and harvesting went right back into eating. Deep into the late pre-industrial era, unskilled laborers worked grueling hours in fields to earn an income that could often barely feed their family. As Gregory Clark explained in his book A Farewell to Alms, up until the 1700s, the English diet consisted, monotonously, of mostly bread and beer, won only after hours that would make a modern i-banker blush. Food output per person was so meager that “British farm laborers by 1863 had just reached the median consumption of [primitive] forager and subsistence societies.”
Today, food is faster. The Big Mac takes very little work for any one person. It is a product of as much automated manufacturing as human labor. Even U.S. food-prep workers, by some measures the poorest-paid major occupation in America, earn enough to buy more than two Big Macs — that’s 1,000+ calories — in just an hour of their work. […]In additional to being a technological marvel, the Big Mac moonlights as an economic tool. Every year theEconomist calculates a Big Mac Index for the purpose of (being cheeky and) testing what currencies are overvalued compared to the U.S. The results are often illuminating. This year identified Switzerland and Brazil as particularly overvalued. The flight from euros is lifting the franc and the real’s appreciation has blunted Brazil’s export growth. So, the Big Mac isn’t just some dumb lump of something resembling meat. It’s an international barometer of economic activity.
And now, in a research paper released last week, Princeton’s Orley C. Ashenfelter has done something truly fascinating with the Big Mac. He used the world’s most famous sandwich to help us answer one of the trickiest questions in all of economics: How do poor nations get rich?
(via npr)
I think I’ll read the series again sometime next year. It’s been a while since I’ve dived headfirst into these stories.
(via eyesbiglove-crumbs)
(Source: iheartqi, via eyesbiglove-crumbs)
What on earth are the debates between Romney and Obama going to be like during the general election? Like, are they going to argue about anything? I guess they’ll just agree on everything and it’ll be a short program. Will they have to put movie trivia and NFL predictions in just to have some…